A former engineer at Elon Musk’s xAI has filed swimsuit towards the corporate and its mum or dad SpaceX claiming he was fired for elevating considerations about AI security.
Devin Kim, who left xAI in September 2025, filed the swimsuit in a California state courtroom on Tuesday. The criticism comes days earlier than SpaceX is about to hitch the general public markets in what’s shaping as much as be the most important IPO in historical past.
In response to the lawsuit, which TechCrunch has considered, Kim turned a distinguished voice for AI security whereas engaged on Grok, xAI’s AI chatbot. He allegedly complained repeatedly about xAI’s failure to prioritize security in Grok’s growth, a product that has since come beneath hearth for a variety of security and behavioral points. Particularly, Kim was involved with the chance that Grok may foment discrimination and assist unfold details about weapons of mass destruction.
“Grok, after all, proved Mr. Kim proper by participating in spectacular shows of on-line hatred and vitriol, with the mannequin likening itself to Hitler (‘MechaHitler’),” the lawsuit reads. “Following the Hitler debacle, Mr. Kim labored to re-evaluate Grok’s political bias and discriminatory tendencies.”
A couple of months after Kim departed xAI, Grok made headlines once more when the chatbot was used to flood X — Musk’s social media platform that additionally falls beneath the xAI umbrella — with nonconsensual sexual imagery.
The lawsuit additionally positions Kim as a whistleblower who was involved about xAI’s alleged disregard for AI security as “illegal” in areas reminiscent of web regulation, client safety and unfair enterprise practices, and arms and explosives regulation, amongst others.
xAI and SpaceX didn’t instantly reply to requests for remark.
Kim’s deal with AI security predates his time at xAI. Whereas working at Scale AI, Kim labored on early security AI initiatives, like main a venture that produced coaching information for AI to coach programs to detect dangerous content material and adjust to governance insurance policies. Final week, the nonprofit Middle for AI Security, which focuses on AI dangers, named Kim as its president.
Apparently, the lawsuit doesn’t implicate Musk himself as a motive for a scarcity of security. Fairly, Kim’s legal professionals describe Musk as having directed xAI to observe the legislation and implement applicable security and testing processes. As a substitute the declare targets Kim’s supervisor, xAI co-founder Jimmy Ba — who left the corporate earlier this yr — saying that Ba ignored Musk’s directives and retaliated towards Kim for pushing for safeguards, in an effort to “silence his repeated complaints about AI security and biases.”
The lawsuit portrays Ba as somebody who vehemently opposed AI security measures, allegedly telling Kim at one level “AI will kill us all anyway,” and who was as a substitute pushed by a mission to make xAI the primary to achieve superintelligence.
“In a single occasion in or round August 2025, Mr. Ba tried to thwart EU security rules throughout the launch of Grok Code 1, misrepresenting elements of the mannequin to be able to keep away from legally required testing,” the criticism says. “Mr. Ba indicated that he would somewhat launch an unsafe mannequin than a poor-performing one. Mr. Musk finally needed to intervene.”
In response to the lawsuit, Kim had supposed to provide a presentation of his findings the week of September 15, 2025, however Ba referred to as him into a gathering and advised him they need to “go [their] separate methods” with out offering a passable motive.
TechCrunch has reached out to Ba for remark.
Kim is searching for compensatory and punitive damages, in addition to a declaratory judgment that xAI and SpaceX’s conduct was illegal.
While you buy by way of hyperlinks in our articles, we could earn a small fee. This doesn’t have an effect on our editorial independence.
