The Quebec Superior Court docket has prevented the Metropolis of Montreal from dismantling a homeless encampment underneath an overpass, saying officers failed to offer an acceptable various for the unhoused residents.
The ruling forces town to respect a bylaw it adopted earlier this yr on homelessness, which says shifting an encampment is a final resort and requires officers to establish zones the place tents might be tolerated. The choice by Justice Alexandre Pless additionally affirms the constitutional rights to security, safety and dignity of individuals experiencing homelessness.
“This doesn’t indicate a free-standing proper to acceptable any property they select for so long as they select. However a human being can not exist nowhere,” Pless wrote in his ruling dated Monday.
He stated town failed to supply viable alternate options to the ten individuals who have been dwelling underneath the Van Horne overpass, close to a skate park, because the fall of 2025. The choose issued an indefinite injunction permitting them to remain till the case is heard on its deserves.
Nonetheless, he stated if officers discover one other location for the residents, “one that’s sustainable, protected, and respects the residents’ dignity, it stays open to town to once more ask the residents to maneuver.”
Get every day Nationwide information
Get every day Canada information delivered to your inbox so you will by no means miss the day’s prime tales.
In Could, town despatched the Van Horne encampment residents a discover asking them to relocate to make sure public entry to the close by skate park and basketball court docket. The Cellular Authorized Clinic, which promotes entry to justice for these experiencing homelessness, took up the case and filed an injunction towards the eviction.
The authorized clinic has additionally obtained safeguards defending a big encampment within the metropolis’s east finish.
Université de Montréal legislation professor Karine Millaire says she expects Pless’s injunction to weigh closely when the case is heard on its deserves, which may result in a everlasting order stopping an eviction.
She pointed to a latest determination from the Ontario Superior Court docket overturning a bylaw in Waterloo, Ont., that might have allowed town to clear an encampment on a web site it needed to show right into a transit hub. Justice Michael R. Gibson wrote that evicting weak individuals from encampments with out offering alternate options infringes on their proper to life.
Millaire says choices like these issued by Pless and Gibson “must be a wake-up name.”
“It’s turning into a humanitarian disaster in Canada’s main cities,” she stated, with courts having to “pit particular person or state possession towards individuals’s proper to dwell.”
In accordance with court docket paperwork, the Metropolis of Montreal had offered the Van Horne encampment residents with two choices. One was one other stretch of land underneath the Van Horne overpass additional away from the general public parks. Nonetheless, the residents stated that stretch was decrease to the bottom, making it inconceivable to sleep due to fixed visitors noise.
The second location supplied by town was deemed unsuitable by the clinic as a result of the positioning might be was a skating rink within the winter.
On behalf of the ten residents, the clinic argued that dismantling their encampment would violate their rights to security and dignity, amongst others, and that forcing them to maneuver would trigger them severe or irreparable hurt.
Pless agreed, citing a report from an professional offered in court docket that stated evicting unhoused individuals from encampments creates elevated stress, decreased mobility, higher social isolation, lack of neighborhood assist and elevated dangers to well being and private safety.
© 2026 The Canadian Press
