Wintermute Founder Rejects Aave (AAVE) Token Alignment Plan as Governance Rift Deepens

Wintermute mentioned it’s going to vote in opposition to Aave’s token alignment proposal, citing unclear governance, weak worth seize, and escalating political infighting.

Wintermute founder and CEO Evgeny Gaevoy mentioned the buying and selling agency will vote in opposition to Aave’s token alignment proposal, including to the rising opposition inside the Aave DAO because the vote nears its conclusion.

In an in depth thread on X, Gaevoy mentioned Wintermute disagrees with the proposal “because it stands,” whereas arguing that it asks tokenholders to decide to a serious plan of action with out enough readability on construction, governance, or outcomes. He disclosed that Wintermute has been an investor in AAVE since 2022 and participates actively in governance, however neither he nor the agency has any fairness publicity to Aave Labs.

Wintermute Slams Proposal

In response to the manager, the primary situation is worth accrual and a widening expectation mismatch between Aave Labs and a good portion of AAVE tokenholders over who ought to seize worth and the way key exterior features, significantly enterprise improvement, ought to function. He mentioned these unresolved tensions make the present proposal untimely and probably dangerous.

Gaevoy too criticised the tone and politics surrounding the vote. Whereas acknowledging that Aave founder Stani Kulechov’s communications “have been removed from good,” he mentioned the backlash in opposition to Aave Labs has gone too far and has negatively impacted the token’s value.

Each side, he added, are accusing one another of “hostile takeovers,” a declare he mentioned has some validity relying on perspective. Gaevoy additionally mentioned that reversing or softening earlier choices, corresponding to fee-related adjustments, might have helped reset the scenario. However as an alternative, the dispute escalated.

He framed the vote as a “temperature test” relatively than a decisive endpoint, saying the actual precedence needs to be de-escalation and severe work on long-term options for token worth seize. Whereas urging Aave Labs to interact constructively after the vote, Gaevoy wrote,

“Whether or not it succeeds or fails would not actually matter.”

You might also like:

The feedback come because the token alignment proposal seems unlikely to go. Snapshot knowledge reveals {that a} majority of AAVE DAO voters are opposed or abstaining, with roughly 55% voting in opposition to the proposal, about 41% abstaining, and three.5% voting in favor. Voting is about for December 26.

Critics have argued that Aave Labs rushed the governance course of and pushed the proposal to a vote whereas discussions had been nonetheless ongoing. The broader dispute traces again to a battle over swap price diversion, value thousands and thousands of {dollars}, that might have benefited the corporate relatively than the DAO treasury.

The alignment proposal itself focuses on tokenholders searching for management over Aave’s model belongings, together with domains, social media accounts, and naming rights. The top objective is to make sure that any entity holding these belongings stays accountable to the DAO.

2026 Roadmap

Previous to the governance tensions, the platform laid out an bold roadmap for 2026 that goals to scale the protocol properly past its present footprint. Kulechov unveiled the plan, which facilities on three pillars: Aave V4, Horizon, and the Aave App. Aave V4 is anticipated to revamp the lending protocol to scale back liquidity fragmentation and assist a lot bigger capital flows.

Horizon focuses on institutional customers, permitting corporations to borrow in opposition to tokenized real-world belongings corresponding to US Treasuries whereas assembly compliance wants. In the meantime, the Aave App is positioned as a consumer-facing product aimed toward onboarding thousands and thousands of recent customers as Aave targets broader adoption.