Crypto billionaires are threatening to go away the state of California after a distinguished commerce union proposed a 5% property tax on residents price greater than $1 billion.
The Service Staff Worldwide Union-United Healthcare Employees West proposed the brand new tax again in November 2025. The commerce union recommended that the brand new tax would usher in as much as $100 billion from 200 state residents, greater than making up for federal funding cuts to California’s state healthcare program. The measure would require 850,000 signatures earlier than it may be placed on the poll for a preferred vote within the 2026 elections in November.
Distinguished buyers and billionaires based mostly in California, resembling PayPal co-founder Peter Thiel and Google co-founder Larry Web page, have already threatened to go away. Others have argued {that a} billionaire’s exit might take away essential sources of tax income for the state.
Nonetheless, the uber-rich threatening to go away because of taxes isn’t a brand new phenomenon, and previous expertise means that the threats of exodus from crypto riches could also be a bluff.
Crypto billionaires “quietly discussing” whether or not to go away
The union filed its proposal on Nov. 26. Along with the 5% tax, it could additionally impose a one-time tax of $1 billion on state residents price over $20 billion. The levy on wealth, quite than earnings, would represent a tax on unrealized beneficial properties.
Distinguished members of the crypto business, in addition to the tech and enterprise capital sectors current in California, are actually up in arms.
Jesse Powell, co-founder and chairman of cryptocurrency trade Kraken, called the measure a “theft,” stating that the tax “would be the remaining straw. Billionaires will take with all of them of their spending, hobbies, philanthropy and jobs.”
Bitwise CEO Hunter Horsley said“Many who’ve made this state nice are quietly discussing leaving or have determined to go away within the subsequent 12 months.” He stated that billionaires will doubtless observe a supposedly rising pattern of “folks voting their views not with the poll field” and relocate to different jurisdictions.
Chamath Palihapitiya, a former Fb govt and distinguished enterprise capital investor, claimed that individuals with a collective web price of $500 billion had already fled the state. “They took no danger due to the proposed asset seizure tax – launched as a ‘Billionaire Tax.'”
He famous a standard argument amongst detractors of the tax, specifically that, whereas the tax could also be a boon for state coffers within the brief run, “the California finances deficit will solely get larger.”
Horsley said“When billionaires go away, so does income. If income goes down, the state might want to both: (A) scale back their spending / packages / advantages (B) improve taxes on those that keep, with no improve in advantages.”
Conservative suppose tanks just like the Cato Institute have argued up to now that the highest earners pay a disproportionate share of earnings tax.
The crypto business might discover it particularly simple to relocate within the headwinds of recent taxes, in keeping with Fort Island Ventures companion Nic Carter. Hey said that capital is now “extra cellular than ever” and that “distributed or globalized startups are fully unusual now, even at scale.”
What do the wealthy truly do after a brand new tax?
In 2024, the Tax Justice Community, a British advocacy group, revealed a working paper on the subject. It discovered that after wealth tax reforms had been launched in Norway, Sweden and Denmark, lower than 0.01% of the richest households relocated.
The UK noticed the second-highest web outflow of millionaires in 2024, with over 9,000 leaving the nation. However the Tax Justice Community’s communications head, Mark Bou Mansour, noted that this was lower than 1% of some 3 million millionaires supposedly residing within the nation on the time.
“There isn’t any millionaire exodus. When you take a look at their revealed migration numbers going again to 2013, millionaire migration charges have persistently stood at lower than 1% yearly since then, each globally and nationally. So, what their information truly reveals, taken at face worth, is that millionaires are extremely motionless,” he stated.
One other 2024 paper from the London College of Economics discovered that the ultra-wealthy had been pretty connected to their place and couldn’t discover respondents within the 1% tax bracket who would go away the UK.
Such examples presume that the rich had been shifting to a different nation, however even within the case of California, the place the crypto-rich would danger solely shifting to a different state, the info nonetheless doesn’t assist the chance of a wealth exodus.
Inequality.org, an advocacy group involved with wealth distribution within the US, said that “whereas some tax migration is inevitable, the rich that transfer to keep away from taxes signify a tiny share of their very own social class.”
Citing information from the Institute for Coverage Research and the State Income Alliance, Inequality.org said that high earners have a tendency to not transfer due to household, social networks and native enterprise data.
Regardless of tax hikes in Washington state and Massachusetts, the variety of people with a web price of not less than seven figures continued to develop. Moreover, every state was in a position to increase appreciable income to fund state packages.
Funding state packages appears to be the least of a number of the California ultra-wealthy’s issues. Powell stated that present taxes had been being thrown away over wasteful spending and fraud.
David Sacks, the White Home’s crypto and AI czar and a crypto billionaire in his personal proper, weighed in, status“Why does California want a wealth tax? To fund the huge fraud. Purple states like Texas and Florida do not even have earnings taxes. Democrats steal every part, then blame job creators for his or her ‘greed.'”
Allegations of fraud in states with Democratic governors, like California and Minnesota, have not too long ago preceded the Trump administration sending in federal policing companies just like the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Within the case of Minnesota, native authorities have denied the unverified allegations.
The California tax proposal nonetheless hasn’t made it onto the poll, not to mention handed a vote and approval by the governor. California might lose a few of its crypto-rich, however the advantages in income could also be price it.
Journal: How crypto legal guidelines modified in 2025 — and the way they’re going to change in 2026
