Audits of Ontario’s baby welfare companies could not handle the essential challenge of youngsters in care with further wants, an inside doc admits, as the federal government continues to “evaluate” its long-delayed monetary probes.
Audits of the province’s youngsters’s help societies kicked off within the fall of 2024, after Premier Doug Ford appeared to counsel the thought throughout media questions at a information convention.
Standing on the podium in the summertime of 2024, as tales of huge issues in Ontario’s baby welfare system grew, Ford demanded “a whole audit of your entire system.”
He urged he had heard numerous examples of waste within the sector, promising to unravel the difficulty.
That decision to motion from the premier appeared to have been the catalyst for a sequence of opinions of each non-Indigenous Youngsters’s Help Society (CAS) in Ontario.
The audits had been formally introduced two months later, in October 2024. Officers mentioned that whereas case hundreds had been falling at youngsters’s help societies, prices had been going up and an exterior line-by-line evaluate was needed.
The federal government promised to publish the studies within the spring. They missed that deadline, pledging they had been “weeks away” in October, one other goal that seems to have handed.
However whereas the province labored to promote its message and kicked off the opinions, issues had been raised behind the scenes.
Paperwork obtained by International Information present that, internally, questions had been requested about whether or not or not the audits would really unravel the thorny challenge of kid welfare.

Get each day Nationwide information
Get the day’s prime information, political, financial, and present affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox as soon as a day.
“There’s a excessive threat that the evaluate is not going to handle the interconnected sectoral points associated to youngsters with particular wants and group providers,” a part of a communications plan, put collectively earlier than the announcement, warned.
The doc, obtained utilizing freedom of data legal guidelines, included a urged technique to fight criticism that it was lacking the mark: “Whereas the evaluate is not going to be scoped to incorporate different sectors or providers, the ministry will maintain different sectors knowledgeable about work underway with the evaluate and determine potential intersections.”
The chance emphasised the exact concern many mother or father advocates have expressed about baby welfare and the federal government’s method to the difficulty.
These advocates have mentioned that one of many largest causes prices are nonetheless going up at youngsters’s help societies regardless of fewer youngsters is as a result of those that enter the sector are presenting with ever-more advanced well being or studying wants.
“Their argument is collapsing underneath their very own logic,” Alina Cameron, president of the Ontario Autism Coalition, mentioned, pointing to an absence of areas in packages for high-needs youngsters.
She mentioned that with out adequately funded packages for youngsters with particular schooling wants, dad and mom could be pressured to the brink, and the strain would trickle all the way down to youngsters’s help.
“That is about making certain that helps the province says are there are literally there for households,” she added. “It’s one factor to say this program exists; it’s a complete different factor to know that this program is sufficiently funded to fulfill the wants of our communities.”
Cameron urged {that a} lack of help for folks with high-needs youngsters was resulting in extra interactions with youngsters’s help. In flip, youngsters’s help instances then grow to be extra difficult, explaining the drop in instances however not prices.
“When you’ve got a toddler with extraordinarily excessive wants and also you don’t have entry to that care, which may be very costly, you’ll search for something that may assist your loved ones, that may assist your baby handle. When nothing else is assembly your want, lots of households are turning to CAS. To not give them over to CAS however to ask for assist,” she mentioned.
The identical inside authorities doc raised issues that the timeline for the delayed audits would hamper their findings.
“There’s a low/medium threat that the quick timeframe for the evaluate could affect the depth of research and evaluate outcomes,” a part of the doc mentioned. “The ministry will apply the lean method to the procurement course of and supply info and knowledge to the third celebration to streamline their info gathering.”
Cameron nervous the general method to the audits may result in blame-shifting as an alternative of reform within the struggling sector.
“What they’re auditing CAS for is spending cash that they had been pressured to spend to fulfill the authorized obligations that they’ve underneath this province,” she mentioned. “That’s not accountability, that’s scapegoating.”
The federal government didn’t handle questions from International Information concerning the inside paperwork, delays to the audit or issues about what it might skip over.
“Because the Minister has mentioned, we’ve got obtained the report and are at the moment reviewing it,” a spokesperson mentioned in a brief assertion. “As soon as full, the findings shall be made public.”
© 2026 International Information, a division of Corus Leisure Inc.



