The house owners of a canine seized in Langley, B.C., in what they are saying was a case of mistaken identification, are demanding he be returned after a warrant used to apprehend him was dominated invalid.
The Langley Animal Safety Service (LAPS), which serves because the Township of Langley’s contacted animal management supplier, seized the pit bull named Enzo on April 10, 2024, after an incident at his proprietor’s dwelling.
The household says a contractor had entered their yard with out warning a number of months earlier, and that their different canine, not Enzo, bit him. The person’s accidents required medical consideration.
When animal management officers returned in April, they seized Enzo.
“We are saying that, to start with, they’ve the improper canine,” mentioned Rebeka Breder, the household’s lawyer.
“And even when Enzo was concerned in that, that he ought to be launched due to the best way that he was seized.”
LAPS says the seizure was made beneath its authority because the township’s animal management company, and in session with the municipality.
Get every day Nationwide information
Get the day’s high information, political, financial, and present affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox as soon as a day.
The Township of Langley subsequently sought a court docket order to have Enzo destroyed, attributable to what LAPS says have been “affordable grounds to consider that Enzo was a ‘harmful canine’ beneath provincial laws.”
In a press release, LAPS mentioned an investigation had revealed two assaults, one in January 2024 that left somebody severely injured, and one in February 2024 that left somebody with life-altering accidents, “in addition to a number of stories of regarding behaviour from neighbours and different neighborhood members.”
The household challenged the seizure in court docket earlier this summer time, and on Aug. 26, a provincial court docket decide declared the warrant invalid citing issues with the knowledge offered within the utility.
“The seizure was illegal, breached my shoppers’ constitutional rights, and in our view, what that additional means is that Enzo be launched instantly,” Breder mentioned.
“Proper now there’s completely no authorized authority for LAPS to maintain holding Enzo. I’m hoping we will resolve this with out additional court docket intervention.”
In a press release responding to the ruling, LAPS mentioned it had adopted all current relevant procedures in its dealing with of the warrant, and that the decide rejected allegations it had exaggerated data or misled the court docket, or that it had used extreme power.
“Whereas the warrant has now been dominated to be invalid, LAPS carried out the order in good religion on the time it was issued and in response to the authority granted within the warrant by the Judicial magistrate who issued it,” LAPS mentioned.
“We welcome progress on this case and can proceed to comply with all court docket instructions in addition to route from the Township of Langley relating to Enzo’s future.”
Nobody from the Township of Langley agreed to an interview request.
However in a press release, the municipality mentioned no court docket order had been issued to launch Enzo, and that the Township’s continued possession of the canine was lawful.
It added that the matter stays earlier than the provincial court docket, with one other listening to pending.
© 2025 International Information, a division of Corus Leisure Inc.
