A grievance has been filed with police towards the chief minister of Bihar, Nitish Kumar, and Uttar Pradesh cupboard minister Sanjay Nishad in relation to an incident involving the previous pulling a girl’s face veil (Niqab), based on Indian media.
Kumar has been going through criticism after he pulled off a girl physician’s Niqab at a commencement ceremony. A clip of the incident was broadly shared on social media, displaying the 74-year-old politician handing a certificates to a girl physician through the occasion on Monday and motioning to her to take away her. Niqab.
Earlier than the girl might react, Kumar reached out and pulled down the Niqabexposing her mouth and chin.
Whereas the clip has sparked widespread outrage throughout India and Pakistan, with social media customers, activists and commentators demanding an apology and resignation of the chief minister, Nishad made remarks belittling the gravity of the incident, questioning the outrage over “mere elimination of a burqa”.
Indian information company ANI reported on Wednesday that Samajwadi Occasion (SP) chief Sumaiya Rana had lodged a grievance with police in Lucknow, searching for “strict authorized motion” and the registration of a primary info report towards the 2 leaders.
Talking to ANIthe SP chief criticized the chief minister for his actions.
“A video of Bihar CM Nitish Kumar goes viral on social media during which he’s seen flattening a girl’s hijab … For an individual holding a constitutional place to behave on this method means he’s encouraging his different staff to interact in related acts”, she was quoted as saying.
In line with ANIRana additionally objected to Nishad’s remarks and recalled that the minister had commented that “why is there a lot controversy over eradicating a burqa. His hand solely touched her face. If his hand had touched some place else, what would have occurred then?”
“Primarily based on this, I’ve filed a grievance,” she stated.
Advocate Misham Zaidi, who was one of many attorneys current with Rana, stated that Kumar’s act and the remarks by Nishad had “harm the modesty of a girl”, ANI reported.
“What Sanjay Nishad has achieved incites spiritual sentiments,” he was quoted as saying. “It is a clear-cut case underneath Part 153A, as you’re knowingly partaking in such acts that might instigate riots, create unrest, and disturb the legislation and order of the state.”
In the meantime, he added, “Part 354 will probably be utilized to him (Nitish Kumar) immediately for grabbing and pulling it (the Niqab).”
In line with the Indian Penal Code (IPC), Part 153A pertains to the incitement of “enmity between completely different teams on [grounds] of faith, race, hometown, residence, language,” whereas Part 354 of IPC offers with “assault or use of legal pressure on a girl with intent to “outrage her modesty”.
For his half, Nishad has maintained that his remarks have been “misinterpreted”.
Talking to the Indian information company Press Trust of India (PTI), He alleged that his remark “was misplaced in translation and carried no in poor health intent.”
“My comment was tweaked and twisted, misinterpreted, its spirit misplaced in cacophony and translation,” Nishad was quoted as saying.
