Nvidia’s GTC convention had all the things: trillion greenback gross sales projections, graphics know-how that may yassify video games, grand declarations that each firm wants an OpenClaw technique, and even a robotic model of the beloved snowman Olaf from Disney’s “Frozen.”
On the most recent episode of TechCrunch’s Fairness podcast, TechCrunch’s Kirsten Korosec, Sean O’Kane, and I recapped CEO Jensen Huang’s keynote and debated what it means for Nvidia’s future. And sure, a giant a part of our dialogue centered on poor Olaf, whose microphone needed to be turned off when he began rambling.
Even when the demo had gone flawlessly, Sean would possibly nonetheless have had some reservations, as he famous these shows at all times deal with “the engineering challenges” and never the “actually messy grey areas” on the social facet.
“However what occurs when a child kicks Olaf over?” Sean requested. “After which each different child who sees Olaf get kicked or knocked over has their entire journey to Disney ruined and it ruins the model?”
Learn a preview of our dialog, edited for size and readability, beneath.
Anthony: [CEO Jensen Huang] was mainly saying that each firm must have an OpenClaw technique now. I believe that’s only a very grand assertion that’s meant to be consideration grabbing; I believe it’s additionally attention-grabbing coming at this type of transitional second for OpenClaw.
The founder has gone to OpenAI. So it’s now this open supply undertaking that probably can flourish and evolve past its creator, or it may languish. If firms like Nvidia are investing quite a bit into it, then [it’s] extra doubtless that it’ll proceed to evolve. But it surely’ll be attention-grabbing to see a 12 months from now, whether or not that appears like a prescient assertion or everybody’s like, “Open what?”
Techcrunch occasion
San Francisco, CA
|
October 13-15, 2026
Kirsten: Within the case of Nvidia, it prices them nothing within the grand scheme of issues to launch what they name NemoClaw, which is an open supply undertaking, which they constructed with the OpenClaw creator. But when they don’t do one thing, they’ve quite a bit to lose. So actually that message to me, the best way I translated it when Jensen was like, “Each enterprise must have an OpenClaw technique,” it was, “Nvidia must have an answer or technique for enterprises, as a result of if it’s profitable, it’s one other approach or one other pathway for Nvidia to be a part of quite a few different firms.” So doing nothing is a higher danger than doing one thing that doesn’t go anyplace.
Sean: The actual query right here is why have we not talked about what’s clearly the top sport for Nvidia, and the factor that’s going to show it into the primary $100 trillion firm, which is an Olaf robotic.
Anthony: How may I neglect?
Kirsten: Anthony, simply go to the top of the 2 and a half hours to look at this.
So, the Olaf robotic comes out, and that is one thing that Jensen likes to do. He likes to have these demos and a few of them go higher than others. It is usually to reveal Nvidia’s know-how in robotics, and I don’t know if Olaf was really talking in actual time or if it was programmed — it felt slightly programmed, or it had particular key phrases that it used.
However the best half about it’s that they needed to lower its mic on the finish as a result of it simply began rambling and talking to the group. After which it went over to its little passageway and was slowly lowered. And you might see it on the video. It was nonetheless speaking, however no mic.
Sean: Now we simply want to offer this little robotic a wheelbase. And I do know the right founder who can present it.
I imply, these demos are at all times foolish. I don’t wish to rise up on my soapbox, as a result of I do know that we’ve talked about this slightly bit earlier this week, however this was a formidable demo up till the second the place it fell slightly bit quick.
That is one other actually good instance, although, of [how] robotics is a very attention-grabbing engineering drawback and a very attention-grabbing physics drawback and a very attention-grabbing integration drawback, and all of these things, however this was introduced as, in partnership with Disney, and it’s speculated to be the way forward for Disney parks and issues like that: You’re going to have the ability to stroll round and see Olaf from “Frozen” and take photos of them and all the things.
However these efforts by no means take into account — or actually don’t put entrance and heart in occasions like this — all the opposite issues you need to take into account while you roll stuff out like this. There’s a very good YouTuber, Defunctland, that did a really good video about this — 4 hours lengthy, not too lengthy — in regards to the historical past of Disney making an attempt to get these sorts of robotics into their park, these automatons.
The engineering challenges are actually attention-grabbing and it’s enjoyable to see that historical past, however it at all times comes again to the identical query of: Okay, however what occurs when a child kicks Olaf over? After which each different child who sees Olaf get kicked or knocked over has their entire journey to Disney ruined and it ruins the model?
There’s simply a lot on the social facet of this. And that sounds foolish, however that is the query that we’re type of asking about humanoid robots, too. There’s a lot hype about all this different stuff and we simply don’t actually hear as a lot dialog in regards to the actually messy grey areas on the social facet of these items, and in addition simply integrating them into folks’s lives. We solely ever actually hear in regards to the engineering challenges — which once more, are actually spectacular.
Kirsten: I’ve a counterpoint after which we now have to get to our subsequent [topic]. It is a job creator, as a result of Olaf should have a human babysitter in Disneyland, most likely dressed up as Elsa or one thing else. You may think about that truly, what we’re doing is creating jobs [with] this engineering experiment.
