An anonymous Substack post printed this week accuses compliance startup Delve of “falsely” convincing “a whole bunch of shoppers they have been compliant” with privateness and safety laws, doubtlessly exposing these clients to “legal legal responsibility below HIPAA and hefty fines below GDPR.”
Delve is a Y Combinator-backed startup that final yr introduced elevating a $32 million Sequence A at a $300 million valuation. (The spherical was led by Perception Companions.) On Friday, the startup tried to refute the accusations with on its blog, calling the Substack publish “deceptive” and saying it “comprises quite a few inaccurate claims.”
The Substack publish is credited to “DeepDelver,” who described themselves as working at a (now former) Delve consumer.
DeepDelver recounted receiving an e-mail in December claiming the startup had “leaked a spreadsheet with confidential consumer studies.” Whereas Delve CEO Karun Kaushik apparently assured clients in a subsequent e-mail that they have been in compliance and that no exterior get together gained entry to delicate information, DeepDelver stated they and different clients had turn into suspicious.
“Having the shared expertise of being underwhelmed with the Delve expertise, and having the general sense that one thing fishy was occurring, we determined to pool assets and examine collectively,” they wrote.
Their conclusion? That Delve “achieves its declare of being the quickest platform by producing faux proof, producing auditor conclusions on behalf of certification mills that rubber stamp studies, and skipping main framework necessities whereas telling shoppers they’ve achieved 100% compliance.”
DeepDelver went into appreciable element about these claims, accusing the startup of offering clients with “fabricated proof of board conferences, assessments, and processes that by no means occurred,” then forcing these clients to “select between adopting faux proof or performing largely handbook work with little actual automation or AI.”
Techcrunch occasion
San Francisco, CA
|
October 13-15, 2026
DeepDelver additionally claimed that just about all of Delve’s shoppers appear to have gone via two audit corporations, Accorp and Gradient, which they described as “a part of the identical operation,” one which operates primarily in India, with solely a nominal presence in the US.
These corporations, they stated, are simply rubber-stamping studies that have been generated by Delve. In consequence, DeepDelver stated the startup “inverts” the conventional compliance construction: “By producing auditor conclusions, check procedures, and ultimate studies earlier than any unbiased overview happens, Delve locations itself within the function of each implementer and examiner. This isn’t a technicality. It’s a structural fraud that invalidates the complete attestation.”
Along with accusing Delve of deceptive its clients, DeepDelver stated the startup helps these clients “mislead the general public by internet hosting belief pages that include safety measures that have been by no means carried out.”
As for its personal relationship with Delve, DeepDelver stated their firm has unpublished its belief web page and not depends on the startup for compliance.
Delve responded to the accusations by saying it doesn’t challenge compliance studies in any respect. As an alternative, it’s an “automation platform” that ingests details about compliance, then offers auditors with entry to that info.
“Ultimate studies and opinions are issued solely by unbiased, licensed auditors, not Delve,” the corporate stated.
Delve additionally stated that its clients “can choose to work with an auditor of their selecting or choose to work with one from Delve’s community of unbiased, accredited third-party audit corporations.” These corporations, the startup stated, are “established corporations used broadly throughout the trade, together with by different compliance platforms.”
In response to the accusation that it’s offering clients with “faux proof,” Delve countered that it’s merely providing “templates to assist groups doc their processes in accordance with compliance necessities, as do different compliance platforms.”
“Draft templates are usually not the identical as ‘pre-filled proof,” the corporate stated.
Delve added that it’s “actively investigating any leaks” and is “nonetheless reviewing the Substack.”
TechCrunch despatched an e-mail looking for further remark to the media contact deal with listed on Delve’s web site; the e-mail bounced. We’ve got additionally reached out to DeepDelver for extra remark.
