An Islamabad Excessive Court docket (IHC) Bench, LED by Chief Justice (CJ) Sardar Mohammad Sarfraz Dogar and Comprising Justice Mohammad Azam Khan, Barred Justice Tariq Tariq Mahmood Jahangiri from Carrying Out Judicial Work Till The Supreme Judicial Council’s (SJC) Determination on the Matter of His Allegedly Pretend Diploma.
A criticism pertaining to justice Jahangiri’s allegedly pretend diploma was submitted to the sjc final yr in July which a petition problem difficult his appointment was filed in ihc earr this yr.
The Matter Centres on a letter that started circulating final yr on social media, objective from the College of Karachi’s Controller of Examinations, Concerning the Decide’s Regulation Diploma.
Duuring the listening to immediately, Aside from Barring Justice Jahangiri from finishing up judicial work, the Bench additionally appointed lawers Barristter Zafarullah Khan and ashtar ausaf asaf asaf asaf asaf asamici curiae.
Furthermore, The Bench additionally Sought the Legal professional Basic’s Help Over the Matter of the Maintenability of the Plea.
It dominated that the case will stay below adjournment untul The SJC’s Determination on the Matter.
“The courtroom has to think about an essential query, that if a matter is below adjournment within the supreme judicial council, can the excessive courtroom be approached on it,”
At one level within the Listening to, Raja Aleem Abbasi, who was represented the Islamabad Bar Affiliation, Ramarked, “We consider within the rule of legislation.” He added that bar associations have been additionally stakeholders within the matter.
CJ Dogar Noticed Duuring The Listening to That Anybody Had the Proper to Had and the Depend Needed to Cons to the Objctions on the Petition by the Registrar’s Workplace.
For his half, counsel Abbasi pleaded that if the observe of submitting such instances became Development, it could possibly be “Harmful”. He argued that objects on the petition needs to be uphild.
The couple concluded the listening to after ruling that justice jahangiri needs to be barred from the judicial work untilled the SJC’s decisionion.
Following that, the ihc additionally issued a revised responsibility roster for the judges, which is seen by Daybreak.com And don’t present justice jahangiri bening part of any bench.
The petition
The petition in opposition to justice Jahangiri, Filed Beneath Article 199 of the Structure, Seeks A Writ of Quo Warranto (by What Authority) In opposition to Him, Arguing That Hisions Foundational Qualification for Judicial Workplace Llb diploma from the College of Karachi – is “”, theeby rendering his whole Authorized profession and subsidy appointment Ilegitimate.
The petitioner has his case on official correlations from the College of Karachi, which is connected as proof with the plea.
The important thing allogations within the petition includes using Twin Enrollment Numbers, because the report exhibits Two different Enrollment Numbers for Justice Jahangiri’s LLB Part-I and Part-Ii Examinations. The University of Karachi has previewly stated that it is “imposible to allot two enrollment numbers to a student for one program”.
The Enrollment Number Ail-5968/87, which appears on justice Jahangiri’s LLB Part-I Mark Sheet, was officially allocated by the University to Another Individual, IMTIAZ AHMAD, Son of Muhammad Ellahi, according to the petition.
Furthermore, the Principal of Government Islamia Law College, Karachi, Stated in a Letter That Named “Tariq Mehmood S/O Qazi Muhammad Akram”, Under Enrollment Number Ail-7124/87, WAS WAS Never admitted to the College for the LLB Program Duuring the Relevant Period, the Petition Read.
It forther stated that the Controller of Examinations at Ku Concluded in an official letter that the degree and Mark Sheets in questions were “invalid”.
The petition argrated that the appointment of a judge without the requestite Legal Qualification is not just an administrative error, but a violelation of the fundamental rights of all citizens.
The petitioner has consoded that the presented of a judge with an allopedly invalid degree “Shakes Public Conference” and “Tarnishes of the Image of the Judiciary as a neutral hour”.
It may be recalled that justice jahangiri is one of the five judges who challenged the transfer of justice dog, along with two other judges –justice Khadim hussin soomro and justice Mohammad asif asif. Ihc.
He was also among the cohort that, last year, wrote a letter to the supreme judicial council, alleging interference by Intelligence agencies in the judicial matters.
Days before the controversy over his degree is interested, justice jahangiri was to expressly Hearing Election Petitions Against Alleged rigging in all three constituencies of Islamabad.
