The Justice Division has spent years making an attempt to interrupt up Google’s gargantuan promoting enterprise throughout two separate antitrust lawsuits: one filed in 2020 targeted on Google’s dominance in search, and a second filed in 2023 that particularly focused Google’s ad-technology enterprise. Each instances argued that the search large’s grip on the digital advert economic system represents an unlawful monopoly.
Courts have largely sided with the federal government in each instances. In 2024, a court docket decided that Google’s search enterprise, together with its exceedingly profitable search-ad operation, was an unlawful monopoly, claiming that the tech large had “exercised its monopoly energy” to dominate the search business and search advertisements. Final April, a second court case — this one targeted particularly on Google’s ad-tech enterprise — additionally got here to the identical conclusion.
Following the 2024 ruling, Justice Division officers instructed a wide range of methods Google’s search enterprise could possibly be damaged up, together with divesting its Chrome browser and Android working system. However in September 2025, the decide overseeing that case, Amit Mehta, rejected these divestiture requests, ruling that Google may hold each Chrome and Android. He did order the corporate to finish unique default-placement offers and share sure search knowledge with opponents (treatments that Google is presently interesting).
That very same sample held this week. In a ruling handed down on Wednesday, federal decide Leonie M. Brinkema of the Jap District of Virginia, who oversaw the ad-tech case, mentioned that Google would have the ability to hold its promoting enterprise. As an alternative of promoting it, the search large will as a substitute be required to regulate its enterprise practices to favor opponents, Brinkema mentioned. The New York Occasions notes that the decide’s ruling “didn’t present specifics” as to how Google ought to go about doing that.
Brinkema’s full written ruling will stay beneath seal for 14 days to permit these concerned to subject essential redactions. Her discovering that Google had acted illegally in sustaining its ad-tech enterprise dates again to April of final yr; this week’s determination addressed solely the treatment.
Unsurprisingly, Google framed the result as a win. Lee-Anne Mulholland, Google’s vp for regulatory affairs, instructed TechCrunch: “We’re very happy the Courtroom rejected the DOJ’s proposal to interrupt aside instruments that assist small companies attain new clients and develop.”
The internet advertising ecosystem is notoriously opaque and byzantine and, for most individuals unfamiliar with its complexities, troublesome to know. A lot of the federal government’s ad-tech case in opposition to Google revolved across the firm’s ways to make sure that its search engine was the default engine in units the world over, which in flip helped its advert enterprise dominate as effectively.
To do that, Google used exclusive agreements with machine producers, which made it the default search engine throughout big swaths of the cell phone market, the federal government has argued. Google additionally entered into income sharing agreements with cell carriers — offers the place carriers earned a minimize of advert income in alternate for retaining Google because the default — that additional cemented its place because the de facto search engine throughout telephone markets.
If you buy by hyperlinks in our articles, we might earn a small fee. This doesn’t have an effect on our editorial independence.