US Vice President JD Vance has come out swinging in opposition to The Wall Road Journal over its latest report linking President Donald Trump to a sexually suggestive message allegedly written for Jeffrey Epstein’s fiftieth birthday tribute e book.In a fiery submit on X, Vance accused the WSJ of publishing what he known as a “hit piece” in opposition to Trump with out offering credible proof. “I don’t know if the e book exists—WSJ received’t present it to us. I don’t know if the letter exists—WSJ received’t present it to us,” he wrote. “It’s disgraceful, and it’s why the president sued,” he added.Vance additionally pushed again on the broader narrative, calling it “absurd {that a} main American paper would assault the President of the US with out revealing the idea”, referring to allegations that Trump write poems to Epstein, and warning that the media will “dribble little particulars out for days or even weeks in an effort to assassinate the president’s character.”Additional, accusing them of pushing Democrats’ narrative he additional mentioned, “Everybody will simply transfer on from the truth that the WSJ is performing like a Democrat SuperPAC.”His remarks comply with a Wall Road Journal report revealed final week claiming that Trump signed a crude drawing in a birthday e book compiled by Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s longtime affiliate who’s presently serving a 20-year sentence for intercourse trafficking minors. The Journal alleged that Trump’s contribution included the define of a unadorned girl together with his signature under her waist, reportedly captioned with the phrase, “Could day-after-day be one other fantastic secret.”Trump swiftly denied the allegation, posting on Reality Social that the letter was a “FAKE.” The White Home additionally issued an announcement dismissing the claims as politically motivated. “That is nothing greater than a continuation of the pretend information tales concocted by the Democrats and the liberal media,” mentioned spokesperson Steven Cheung.The report additionally resurfaced Trump’s prior connections to Epstein, together with a 1997 inscription in a replica of The Artwork of the Comeback that learn, “To Jeff- You’re the biggest!” A beforehand unreleased picture of Trump, Epstein, and singer James Brown was additionally reviewed by The New York Occasions, additional fueling scrutiny of their previous ties.The controversy has intensified calls from lawmakers and the general public to launch sealed Epstein-related paperwork. A key Home committee voted this week to subpoena information from the Justice Division, and Rep. Ro Khanna has indicated he plans to subpoena Epstein’s property for the unique birthday e book.Epstein’s property mentioned Thursday it will adjust to all lawful processes. In the meantime, Maxwell’s function stays central- she reportedly wrote the e book’s introductory letter and met with a Justice Division official this week.Whereas the WSJ and NYT say they’ve reviewed elements of the e book and Maxwell’s letter, they’ve but to publish full photos of the supplies in query, prompting continued criticism from Trump’s allies.Trump’s lawsuit Trump filed a libel and slander lawsuit in opposition to Dow Jones, Information Corp together with two Wall Road Journal reporters, and the paper’s proprietor Rupert Murdoch. In a submit on Reality Social, Trump introduced that he filed a ‘powerhouse lawsuit.’ “Now we have simply filed a POWERHOUSE Lawsuit in opposition to everybody concerned in publishing the false, malicious, defamatory, FAKE NEWS “article” within the ineffective “rag” that’s, The Wall Road Journal,” the MAGA supremo mentioned.“This historic authorized motion is being introduced in opposition to the so-called authors of this defamation, the now absolutely disgraced WSJ, in addition to its company house owners and associates, with Rupert Murdoch and Robert Thomson (no matter his function is!) on the high of the checklist,” Trump added. The lawsuit was filed within the federal court docket for the Southern District of Florida, based mostly in Miami. A full copy of the criticism had not but been made public.
